Report an error
Snow days in Nashville correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Number of home runs hit by Matt Kemp | r=0.93 | 9yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on tobacco products and smoking supplies | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
| Public Library Website Visits in the UK | r=0.26 | 8yrs | Yes! |
| Worldwide Harry Potter Movies Revenue | r=0.17 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| The distance between Mercury and Earth | r=-0.65 | 28yrs | No |
Snow days in Nashville also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
