Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.
Report an error
Total views on The Game Theorists YouTube videos correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of accountants and auditors in Texas | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Emerson | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Theology | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Biogen's stock price (BIIB) | r=0.97 | 15yrs | No |
| Number of Walmart stores worldwide | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Physical sciences | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
| The distance between Saturn and Earth | r=0.92 | 15yrs | No |
| The number of university political science teachers in Virginia | r=0.92 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'drake' meme | r=0.91 | 15yrs | No |
| The marriage rate in Mississippi | r=0.76 | 13yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'why do i have green poop' | r=-0.86 | 15yrs | No |
Total views on The Game Theorists YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)