Report an error
Average length of Matt Parker's YouTube videos correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Kentucky | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
| The number of structural iron and steel workers in Indiana | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
| The number of sonographers in Delaware | r=0.95 | 12yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Mara | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
| The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Kentucky | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
| The number of university cultural studies teachers in Minnesota | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Russell | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
| Google's Net Income | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
| NIKE, Inc.'s stock price (NKE) | r=0.92 | 13yrs | No |
| The number of movies Grace Kelly appeared in | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Naomi | r=0.91 | 12yrs | No |
| US household spending on major appliances | r=0.91 | 12yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Psychology | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'Mr. Beast' | r=0.88 | 13yrs | No |
| The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.87 | 13yrs | No |
| The number of cartographers in New York | r=0.66 | 12yrs | No |
Average length of Matt Parker's YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)