Report an error
Popularity of the first name Marshall correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'google' | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'cute cats' | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Chad | r=0.76 | 42yrs | No |
The number of movies Elizabeth Olsen appeared in | r=0.73 | 30yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Argentina | r=0.7 | 42yrs | No |
Renewable energy production in Congo-Brazzaville | r=0.7 | 42yrs | No |
Global plane crashes | r=0.67 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Marshall also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)