Report an error
Patents granted to Boeing correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of marketing managers in Massachusetts | r=0.99 | 12yrs | No |
| The number of veterinarians in Alaska | r=0.99 | 12yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Camilla | r=0.98 | 12yrs | No |
| Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| Mozzarella cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Louisa | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
| Average length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
| Air quality in Los Angeles | r=0.84 | 12yrs | No |
| Detroit Tigers' American League Ranking | r=0.78 | 12yrs | No |
Patents granted to Boeing also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)