Report an error
Popularity of the first name Cooper correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Yogurt consumption | r=0.98 | 32yrs | No | 
| Hollister retail store count worldwide | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No | 
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.96 | 44yrs | No | 
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.94 | 43yrs | No | 
| UFO sightings in California | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No | 
| Budget for largest movie production | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No | 
| Gasoline Prices in the US | r=0.91 | 33yrs | No | 
| UFO sightings in Missouri | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No | 
| The number of accountants and auditors in Florida | r=0.87 | 20yrs | No | 
| Canadian Natural Resources' stock price (CNQ) | r=0.87 | 21yrs | Yes! | 
| Annual US household spending on gasoline | r=0.81 | 23yrs | No | 
| Hess Corporation's stock price (HES) | r=0.81 | 21yrs | Yes! | 
Popularity of the first name Cooper also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
