Report an error
Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The price of gold | r=0.95 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.94 | 9yrs | No |
The number of conservation scientists in Arizona | r=0.93 | 19yrs | Yes! |
London Gold Prices | r=0.91 | 9yrs | No |
Global sales revenue of elevators and escalators | r=0.91 | 7yrs | No |
Grocery store spend in New Jersey | r=0.91 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jonah | r=0.88 | 19yrs | No |
Grocery store spend in Alaska | r=0.88 | 17yrs | No |
Global shipwrecks | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
Air quality in Jacksonville, Florida | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' | r=0.83 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'batman' | r=0.73 | 19yrs | No |
Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)