Report an error
Popularity of the first name Jayden correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Master's degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
| Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.96 | 35yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Yemen | r=0.94 | 42yrs | No |
| Pirate attacks globally | r=0.94 | 14yrs | No |
| United States music album sales | r=0.93 | 16yrs | No |
| New York Times Fiction Best Sellers | r=0.93 | 38yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'xkcd' | r=0.92 | 16yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in California | r=0.89 | 45yrs | No |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.84 | 44yrs | No |
| Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR) | r=0.8 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Jayden also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)