Report an error
Popularity of the first name Demi correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Total likes of Technology Connections YouTube videos | r=0.99 | 8yrs | Yes! |
| Votes for Libertarian Senators in Utah | r=0.98 | 6yrs | Yes! |
| Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka | r=0.98 | 17yrs | Yes! |
| Average number of comments on Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
| McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
| Average views of Tom Scott's YouTube videos | r=0.94 | 14yrs | No |
| Boeing's stock price (BA) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'we live in a society' meme | r=0.83 | 17yrs | No |
| The number of fashion designers in Washington | r=0.81 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Demi also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)