Report an error
Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Business management | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Business | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
The number of middle school teachers in New Hampshire | r=0.92 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The number of secretaries in Louisiana | r=0.89 | 13yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Criminal justice and corrections | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
United States' Fruit Juice Export Volume | r=0.86 | 13yrs | No |
Air quality in Carbondale, Illinois | r=0.85 | 7yrs | No |
Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.85 | 13yrs | No |
The average age of batters for the Minnesota Twins | r=0.66 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Allegra | r=0.62 | 48yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Courtland | r=0.62 | 48yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Saturn and Jupiter | r=0.61 | 48yrs | No |
Points allowed by the Baltimore Ravens | r=0.53 | 27yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Shelbi | r=0.48 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Chelsey | r=0.48 | 48yrs | No |
Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)