Report an error
Popularity of the first name Celine correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Master's degrees awarded in Parks & Recreation | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of pest control workers in Alabama | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Google's Annual Global Revenue | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'tetanus' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'cold shower' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'when is new years' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
| Costco Wholesale's stock price (COST) | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
| Points scored by the Minnesota Vikings | r=0.54 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Celine also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)