Report an error
Number of games won by Detroit Red Wings in NHL season correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How insightful Technology Connections YouTube video titles are | r=0.96 | 8yrs | No |
Total views on PBS Space Time YouTube videos | r=0.86 | 8yrs | No |
The number of city bus drivers in Missouri | r=0.85 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Gasoline pumped in Kosovo | r=0.85 | 14yrs | No |
The number of school teachers in Maryland | r=0.82 | 13yrs | No |
United States music album sales | r=0.81 | 16yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about childhood | r=0.71 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Brennon | r=0.71 | 48yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Uranus and Venus | r=0.59 | 48yrs | Yes! |
Gasoline pumped in Dominica | r=0.56 | 42yrs | No |
Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos | r=-0.97 | 8yrs | No |
Number of games won by Detroit Red Wings in NHL season also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)