Report an error
Javier Mascherano's International Match Count correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of truck drivers in Nebraska | r=0.99 | 7yrs | No |
Renewable energy production in Antigua and Barbuda | r=0.98 | 7yrs | No |
Average views of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 6yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Nicaragua | r=0.94 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'luke skywalker' | r=0.88 | 13yrs | No |
Javier Mascherano's International Match Count also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)