Report an error
Popularity of the first name Ada correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Electricity generation in Angola | r=1 | 42yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in France | r=0.99 | 29yrs | No |
| Becton, Dickinson and Company's stock price (BDX) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
| Butter consumption | r=0.97 | 32yrs | No |
| The number of statisticians in North Carolina | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Aflac's stock price (AFL) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Automotive recalls for issues with the Electrical System | r=0.95 | 48yrs | No |
| Google searches for '3Blue1Brown' | r=0.91 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ada also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)