Report an error
Wins for the Chicago White Sox correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Liquefied petroleum gas used in Central African Republic | r=0.81 | 14yrs | Yes! | 
| Associates degrees awarded in Dental assisting | r=0.69 | 11yrs | No | 
| The number of fast food cooks in Illinois | r=0.68 | 20yrs | No | 
| Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) | r=0.56 | 48yrs | Yes! | 
| Google searches for 'why isnt 11 pronounced onety one' | r=0.54 | 19yrs | No | 
| Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.47 | 32yrs | No | 
| Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' | r=0.46 | 20yrs | No | 
Wins for the Chicago White Sox also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
