Report an error
Wins for the San Diego Padres correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Associates degrees awarded in Dental assisting | r=0.9 | 11yrs | No |
| US average milk-fat content of cream products | r=0.73 | 7yrs | No |
| Visitors to SeaWorld California | r=0.69 | 15yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on clothing | r=0.61 | 23yrs | No |
| How cool CGP Grey YouTube video titles are | r=0.6 | 13yrs | No |
| Air quality in Crescent City, California | r=0.54 | 36yrs | No |
| Brick cheese consumption | r=0.45 | 27yrs | No |
Wins for the San Diego Padres also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
