Report an error
Global Per Capita Rice Consumption correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Nuclear power generation in Germany | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Americus, Georgia | r=0.91 | 7yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Library science | r=0.91 | 9yrs | No |
| The number of phlebotomists in Connecticut | r=0.91 | 8yrs | No |
| Sherbet consumption | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
| Petroluem consumption in France | r=0.88 | 20yrs | No |
| Violent crime rates | r=0.88 | 20yrs | No |
| Ice cream consumption | r=0.88 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of legislators in Alaska | r=0.88 | 17yrs | Yes! |
| Arson in Florida | r=0.85 | 20yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Gulfport, Mississippi | r=0.83 | 9yrs | Yes! |
| The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Pennsylvania | r=0.8 | 17yrs | Yes! |
| Votes for Republican Senators in Maine | r=0.72 | 7yrs | No |
| Runs scored by the Atlanta Braves | r=0.55 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of dentists in Maryland | r=-0.84 | 16yrs | No |
Global Per Capita Rice Consumption also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
