Report an error
Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| How provocative PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are | r=0.95 | 7yrs | No |
| Deere & Company's stock price (DE) | r=0.84 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| NVIDIA's stock price (NVDA) | r=0.82 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| The number of logisticians in Louisiana | r=0.79 | 18yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Taiwan | r=0.75 | 22yrs | Yes! |
| The number of movies Zendaya appeared in | r=0.66 | 11yrs | No |
| Global Permanent Nuclear Reactor Shutdowns | r=0.55 | 17yrs | No |
Academy Award Best Supporting Actress Winner Age also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
