Report an error
The number of sociologists in California correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total length of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 9yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Engineering | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Malia | r=0.77 | 20yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies | r=0.69 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme | r=0.52 | 17yrs | No |
The number of sociologists in California also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)