Report an error
LeBron James' field goal count correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Michigan | r=0.92 | 6yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Kentucky | r=0.88 | 6yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'fidget spinner' meme | r=0.81 | 6yrs | No |
The number of tire repairers and changers in North Carolina | r=0.78 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Runs scored by the Detroit Tigers | r=0.77 | 20yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Sudan | r=0.73 | 19yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Mexico | r=0.71 | 20yrs | No |
NCAA Women's Ice Hockey National Championship Winner's Score | r=0.71 | 20yrs | No |
Wins for the Los Angeles Angels | r=0.7 | 20yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Germany | r=0.69 | 19yrs | No |
The number of physicists in Alabama | r=0.69 | 20yrs | No |
Air pollution in Elizabethtown, Kentucky | r=0.68 | 20yrs | No |
Robberies in the US | r=0.63 | 20yrs | No |
Rain in Berlin | r=0.62 | 20yrs | No |
LeBron James' field goal count also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)