Report an error
Blue cheese consumption correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of fish and game wardens in New York | r=1 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'headache remedies' | r=0.93 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i cant even' | r=0.92 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.92 | 18yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and Mercury | r=0.9 | 27yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Czechia | r=0.89 | 22yrs | No |
Total annual sales revenue of Ford Motors in Canada | r=0.89 | 18yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Sprint | r=0.87 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Brielle | r=0.86 | 27yrs | No |
Global plane crashes | r=0.86 | 27yrs | No |
The number of actuaries in New York | r=0.81 | 19yrs | No |
Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released | r=0.71 | 24yrs | No |
Google searches for 'best breed of dog' | r=0.68 | 18yrs | No |
Blue cheese consumption also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)