Report an error
Golden Boot Player's English Premier League Goal Tally correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air pollution in Salem, Ohio | r=0.92 | 7yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Burundi | r=0.86 | 12yrs | No |
How cool CGP Grey YouTube video titles are | r=0.84 | 12yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Florida | r=0.81 | 10yrs | No |
The number of occupational therapy assistants in Iowa | r=0.79 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The number of childcare workers in Illinois | r=0.72 | 13yrs | No |
The number of sewing machine operators in North Dakota | r=0.66 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Golden Boot Player's English Premier League Goal Tally also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)