Report an error
Lionel Messi's match count with Argentina correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.88 | 7yrs | No |
Air pollution in Ottawa | r=0.86 | 6yrs | No |
The number of proofreaders in Kansas | r=0.85 | 16yrs | Yes! |
The number of middle school special education teachers in Vermont | r=0.85 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The number of tax preparers in Mississippi | r=0.8 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The number of garbage collectors in New Mexico | r=0.79 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The divorce rate in Missouri | r=0.74 | 17yrs | No |
The divorce rate in South Dakota | r=0.71 | 17yrs | No |
The number of movies Russell Crowe appeared in | r=0.64 | 18yrs | No |
Lionel Messi's match count with Argentina also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)