Report an error
The number of marriage therapists in New Jersey correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Votes for Democratic Senators in New Jersey | r=0.91 | 6yrs | No | 
| Global shipwrecks | r=0.87 | 12yrs | No | 
| Pirate attacks globally | r=0.84 | 14yrs | No | 
| Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' | r=0.8 | 11yrs | No | 
| US bank failures | r=0.73 | 20yrs | No | 
| Customer satisfaction with Apple | r=0.7 | 19yrs | No | 
The number of marriage therapists in New Jersey also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
