Report an error
UFO sightings in Connecticut correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Eli | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Zoey | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.94 | 37yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Kenzie | r=0.94 | 46yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Thailand | r=0.94 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Global revenue from elevator and escalator sales | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Belgium | r=0.92 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Juliet | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Uganda | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Angola | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Total comments on minutephysics YouTube videos | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
London Gold Prices | r=0.87 | 38yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.87 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Inflation in the US | r=0.81 | 30yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'aint nobody got time for that' meme | r=0.78 | 16yrs | No |
Average temperature in Sydney | r=0.74 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Connecticut also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)