Report an error
UFO sightings in South Dakota correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How nerdy 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are | r=0.96 | 7yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Kenzie | r=0.94 | 46yrs | Yes! |
Number of internet users | r=0.92 | 24yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Serenity | r=0.92 | 46yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Zoey | r=0.91 | 46yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.9 | 36yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.85 | 43yrs | Yes! |
USA Population | r=0.84 | 46yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.84 | 32yrs | No |
UEFA European Cup and Champions League Top Scorer's Goal Count | r=0.8 | 46yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 2nd grade | r=0.75 | 32yrs | No |
UFO sightings in South Dakota also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)