Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in Health professions correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of vending machine repairers in Mississippi | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Global revenue generated by McDonald's | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
The number of movies Channing Tatum appeared in | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
The average age of batters for the New York Yankees | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'bazinga' meme | r=0.92 | 11yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Colorado | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'skydiving accident' | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
The number of movies Mila Kunis appeared in | r=0.9 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'overly attached girlfriend' meme | r=0.78 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Health professions also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)