Report an error
Associates degrees awarded in law enforcement correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Burglaries in Washington | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of bill collectors in Alabama | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
| The number of database administrators in Arkansas | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'zombies' | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| The divorce rate in Arizona | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| Burglaries in California | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| Robberies in New York | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Burglaries in Oregon | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Burglaries in New York | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
| Burglaries in Maine | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
| Burglary rates in the US | r=0.92 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'stop hitting yourself' | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'skydiving accident' | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'minecraft' | r=0.78 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in law enforcement also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)