Report an error
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Engineering technologies correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of tire repairers and changers in Utah | r=1 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for '3Blue1Brown' | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of probation officers in Arizona | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'white house hotline' | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Total comments on MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Renewable energy production in Cameroon | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'how to learn python' | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'Nintendo' | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of fashion designers in Washington | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
| Air quality in Los Angeles | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of fire inspectors in Iowa | r=0.85 | 8yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Engineering technologies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)