Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No | 
| Air quality in Greenwood, South Carolina | r=0.91 | 13yrs | Yes! | 
| Air quality in Greenwood, South Carolina | r=0.87 | 13yrs | No | 
| Votes for Republican Senators in New Mexico | r=0.87 | 6yrs | Yes! | 
| Average views of minutephysics YouTube videos | r=0.86 | 13yrs | Yes! | 
| How nerdy Vihart's YouTube video titles are | r=0.83 | 15yrs | Yes! | 
| Popularity of the 'bazinga' meme | r=0.76 | 18yrs | No | 
| The number of books by Stephen King published | r=0.65 | 11yrs | No | 
| Grand Slam Finals Played by Serena Williams | r=0.59 | 14yrs | Yes! | 
| The number of movies Robert Pattinson appeared in | r=0.58 | 19yrs | No | 
| Points allowed by the New England Patriots | r=0.46 | 20yrs | No | 
| Petroluem consumption in Ireland | r=-0.85 | 19yrs | No | 
| Electricity generation in American Samoa | r=-0.86 | 18yrs | No | 
| US Employment Rate | r=-0.9 | 19yrs | No | 
Google searches for 'where to buy bleach' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
