Report an error
The number of architects in Tennessee correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Solar power generated in Belarus | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
| Biomass power generated in Lebanon | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in American Samoa | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
| Geothermal power generated in France | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
| Global Puma Sales | r=0.91 | 17yrs | No |
| US GDP per capita | r=0.88 | 14yrs | No |
| UnitedHealth Group's stock price (UNH) | r=0.86 | 20yrs | No |
| Visa Inc.'s stock price (V) | r=0.86 | 14yrs | No |
| Eli Lilly and Company's stock price (LLY) | r=0.85 | 20yrs | No |
| US average dairy skim-solid content of cottage cheese | r=0.85 | 19yrs | No |
| S&P Global's stock price (SPGI) | r=0.84 | 20yrs | No |
| Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.83 | 20yrs | No |
The number of architects in Tennessee also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)