Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Exxon Mobil's stock price (XOM) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air quality in Georgetown, South Carolina | r=0.92 | 17yrs | No |
The number of environmental engineers in Pennsylvania | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
The number of medical equipment repairers in Pennsylvania | r=0.91 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Napa, California | r=0.89 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Aubrey | r=0.88 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Biomass power generated in Austria | r=0.83 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Petroluem consumption in Ecuador | r=0.83 | 20yrs | No |
Super Bowl TV viewership | r=0.81 | 21yrs | No |
Grocery store spend in Tennessee | r=0.73 | 19yrs | No |
The number of movies Sienna Miller appeared in | r=0.67 | 22yrs | No |
Exxon Mobil's stock price (XOM) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)