Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Bank of America's stock price (BAC) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of phlebotomists in Georgia | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
The number of human resources specialists in Washington | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
US Motorcycle Manufacturing Industry Revenue | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Agriculture | r=0.95 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'elon musk' | r=0.93 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Rafael | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
The number of construction equipment operators in California | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
Average views of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.88 | 12yrs | No |
The number of middle school special education teachers in Washington | r=0.84 | 20yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 9th grade | r=0.82 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' | r=-0.91 | 20yrs | No |
Bank of America's stock price (BAC) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)