Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
United Parcel Service's stock price (UPS) correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Walker | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'who is elon musk' | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
| Powerball lottery numbers | r=0.94 | 13yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Saige | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'when is new years' | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on furniture | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
| US GDP per capita | r=0.93 | 14yrs | No |
| Automotive recalls issued by Ford Motor Company | r=0.93 | 21yrs | No |
| Global Rice Consumption | r=0.93 | 14yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Ethiopia | r=0.92 | 14yrs | No |
| The number of outdoor power equipment mechanics in Pennsylvania | r=0.88 | 20yrs | No |
United Parcel Service's stock price (UPS) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
