Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
QUALCOMM's stock price (QCOM) correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| The number of first-line supervisors of police and detectives in Colorado | r=0.97 | 13yrs | No | 
| The number of optometrists in California | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No | 
| Google searches for 'who is elon musk' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | Yes! | 
| Popularity of the first name Walker | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the first name Tatum | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No | 
| Microsoft's Worldwide Earnings | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No | 
| Annual US household spending on bakery products | r=0.91 | 21yrs | Yes! | 
| Google searches for 'that is sus' | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No | 
| Solar power generated in Luxembourg | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No | 
| The number of movies Eva Longoria appeared in | r=0.49 | 21yrs | No | 
QUALCOMM's stock price (QCOM) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
