Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
Dollar Tree's stock price (DLTR) correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Wesley | r=0.99 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Canada | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Poland | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Restaurant spending in West Virginia | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Engineering | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Rose | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
Restaurant spending in Arizona | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ellie | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
Food spending in Arizona | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Restaurant spending in Ohio | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.94 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'lost my wallet' | r=0.92 | 17yrs | No |
The number of physical therapists in Texas | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Utah | r=0.82 | 6yrs | No |
Dollar Tree's stock price (DLTR) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)