Report an error
Season wins for the Los Angeles Rams correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Master's degrees awarded in Engineering technologies | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in India | r=0.92 | 27yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme | r=0.89 | 18yrs | No |
| American-type cheese consumption | r=0.88 | 27yrs | No |
| US Tree Nut Consumption per Person | r=0.86 | 22yrs | No |
| Cheddar cheese consumption | r=0.85 | 27yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Wade | r=0.84 | 48yrs | Yes! |
| The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.71 | 33yrs | No |
| Mike Modano's regular season NHL goal assists | r=0.64 | 26yrs | No |
Season wins for the Los Angeles Rams also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
