Report an error
The marriage rate in Kansas correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| US household spending on clothing for men | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
| Per capita consumption of margarine | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Duane | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Catherine | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
| Burglaries in Kansas | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
| Robberies in Kansas | r=0.88 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Anton | r=0.81 | 23yrs | No |
| Value of the Victoria's Secret Annual Fantasy Bra | r=0.81 | 21yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Wichita | r=0.63 | 23yrs | No |
The marriage rate in Kansas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
