Report an error
The marriage rate in New York correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Visitors to Disneyland | r=0.97 | 15yrs | No |
| Visitors to Disney Worlds Magic Kingdom | r=0.96 | 15yrs | No |
| US household spending on public transportation | r=0.85 | 22yrs | No |
| Jet fuel used in United States | r=0.81 | 23yrs | No |
| The number of waiters and waitresses in New York | r=0.79 | 19yrs | No |
| New York Yankees' victories | r=0.67 | 23yrs | No |
| Runs scored by the New York Mets | r=0.67 | 23yrs | No |
| US household spending on shoes | r=0.64 | 22yrs | No |
| Runs scored by the New York Yankees | r=0.64 | 23yrs | No |
| The number of movies Chris Hemsworth appeared in | r=0.61 | 13yrs | No |
The marriage rate in New York also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
