Report an error
The divorce rate in Arkansas correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Milk consumption | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Trenton | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Engineering technologies | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Abbie | r=0.96 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Tristin | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Collin | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Abigayle | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sonya | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Brock | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Bryan | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alexander | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Miguel | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Antoine | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Colin | r=0.86 | 23yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton in Arkansas | r=0.82 | 22yrs | Yes! |
The divorce rate in Arkansas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)