Report an error
Arson in Minnesota correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| The number of postal service machine operators in Minnesota | r=0.95 | 20yrs | Yes! | 
| U.S. intercountry adoptions | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No | 
| The number of cooks, short order in Minnesota | r=0.93 | 20yrs | Yes! | 
| xkcd comics published about romance | r=0.92 | 16yrs | Yes! | 
| Physical album shipment volume in the United States | r=0.92 | 24yrs | Yes! | 
| GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No | 
| US birth rates of triplets or more | r=0.89 | 20yrs | No | 
| Google searches for 'Britney Spears' | r=0.86 | 15yrs | No | 
| United States music album sales | r=0.85 | 16yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the first name Antonio | r=0.81 | 38yrs | No | 
| Petroluem consumption in Antarctica | r=0.75 | 37yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the first name Precious | r=0.75 | 38yrs | No | 
| Fossil fuel use in Denmark | r=0.75 | 37yrs | No | 
Arson in Minnesota also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
