Report an error
Robberies in Vermont correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'fidget spinner' meme | r=0.87 | 6yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about literature | r=0.8 | 16yrs | Yes! |
How nerdy Technology Connections YouTube video titles are | r=0.77 | 8yrs | No |
The number of movies Tom Hardy appeared in | r=0.71 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme | r=0.69 | 8yrs | No |
Google searches for 'titanic' | r=0.54 | 19yrs | No |
Robberies in Vermont also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)