Report an error
Home Run Count for the Texas Rangers Team correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Runs scored by the Atlanta Braves | r=0.7 | 48yrs | No | 
| The divorce rate in Connecticut | r=0.68 | 23yrs | No | 
| Nuclear power generation in France | r=0.66 | 42yrs | No | 
| Runs scored by the Chicago Cubs | r=0.65 | 48yrs | No | 
| The number of private detectives in Nevada | r=0.65 | 20yrs | No | 
| Nuclear power generation in Belgium | r=0.64 | 42yrs | No | 
| The distance between Uranus and Venus | r=0.64 | 48yrs | Yes! | 
| Air quality in Tucson, Arizona | r=0.61 | 43yrs | No | 
| Runs scored by the New York Mets | r=0.61 | 48yrs | No | 
| Air pollution in San Diego, California | r=-0.64 | 43yrs | No | 
Home Run Count for the Texas Rangers Team also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
