Report an error
Air pollution in Minneapolis correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.91 | 13yrs | No | 
| Solar power generated in Moldova | r=0.91 | 8yrs | No | 
| The average number of likes on Extra History YouTube videos | r=0.87 | 12yrs | No | 
| Total likes of Steve Mould's YouTube videos | r=0.85 | 15yrs | No | 
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Transportation | r=0.81 | 10yrs | Yes! | 
| Popularity of the first name Adrienne | r=0.73 | 43yrs | No | 
| Petroluem consumption in Bulgaria | r=0.73 | 42yrs | Yes! | 
| Kerosene used in Romania | r=0.72 | 42yrs | No | 
| Kerosene used in Turkiye | r=0.72 | 43yrs | No | 
| Average number of milk cows in the United States | r=0.66 | 43yrs | No | 
| USA Population | r=-0.58 | 43yrs | No | 
Air pollution in Minneapolis also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
