Report an error
Air quality in Oxnard, California correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Popularity of the first name Phoebe | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the first name Giovanni | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No | 
| Electricity generation in Brazil | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No | 
| Petroluem consumption in Hong Kong | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No | 
| Fossil fuel use in Dominican Republic | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No | 
| Biomass power generated in Sweden | r=0.93 | 42yrs | No | 
| Fossil fuel use in Latvia | r=0.87 | 30yrs | No | 
| UFO sightings in California | r=0.87 | 42yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the first name Jordyn | r=0.87 | 43yrs | No | 
| Fossil fuel use in United States | r=0.85 | 42yrs | No | 
| The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.65 | 44yrs | No | 
Air quality in Oxnard, California also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
