Report an error
Air quality in Phoenix correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Jamila | r=0.8 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in Cuba | r=0.76 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Gasoline pumped in Austria | r=0.76 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Robberies in the US | r=0.75 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Frozen yogurt consumption | r=0.71 | 32yrs | No |
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon | r=0.71 | 36yrs | Yes! |
NASA's budget as a percentage of the total US Federal Budget | r=0.64 | 44yrs | Yes! |
Rain in Phoenix | r=0.54 | 43yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Arizona | r=-0.63 | 42yrs | No |
Air quality in Phoenix also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)