Report an error
Popularity of the first name Jesus correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
U.S. intercountry adoptions | r=0.99 | 23yrs | No |
Google searches for 'desktop background' | r=0.98 | 16yrs | No |
The number of CEOs in Massachusetts | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
The number of telemarketers in California | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Kosovo | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
US birth rates of triplets or more | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Arson in Idaho | r=0.94 | 22yrs | No |
Nuclear power generation in Germany | r=0.93 | 31yrs | No |
US production of cottage cheese | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.92 | 14yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Wyoming | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jesus also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)