Report an error
Popularity of the first name Riley correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Global iPod Sales | r=0.97 | 9yrs | No |
| Petroluem consumption in Taiwan | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
| Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.96 | 39yrs | No |
| Nuclear power generation in South Korea | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
| The number of printing press operators in New Hampshire | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
| The number of electrical and electronics repairers, commercial and industrial equipment in Florida | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
| The distance between Uranus and Mercury | r=0.92 | 48yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in California | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
| Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Michigan | r=0.91 | 12yrs | No |
| The distance between Uranus and Earth | r=0.91 | 48yrs | No |
| Air quality in Los Angeles | r=0.9 | 43yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'shook' | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
| Patents granted in the US | r=0.78 | 46yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Riley also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)