Report an error
Popularity of the first name Summer correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of file clerks in South Carolina | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
| The number of compensation and benefits managers in Puerto Rico | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
| Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers | r=0.96 | 6yrs | No |
| The number of surgens in Wisconsin | r=0.94 | 16yrs | No |
| Air quality in Marquette, Michigan | r=0.91 | 14yrs | No |
| Air quality in Marquette, Michigan | r=0.91 | 14yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'snoop dog' | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
| Wins for the New York Yankees | r=0.62 | 48yrs | No |
| The number of sonographers in New Mexico | r=-0.84 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Summer also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
