Report an error
Popularity of the first name Marisa correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The marriage rate in Nevada | r=0.99 | 23yrs | No |
| The number of postal service machine operators in Connecticut | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of postal service machine operators in Massachusetts | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Pirate attacks globally | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No |
| Kerosene used in Philippines | r=0.93 | 42yrs | No |
| Petroluem consumption in Germany | r=0.92 | 32yrs | No |
| Motor vehicle thefts in Louisiana | r=0.92 | 38yrs | No |
| Robberies in Minnesota | r=0.89 | 38yrs | Yes! |
| Customer satisfaction with Verizon | r=0.86 | 28yrs | No |
| Violent crime rates | r=0.86 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Marisa also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)